[DWJ] Best books of 2010 list

Melissa Proffitt Melissa at Proffitt.com
Mon Mar 7 00:06:53 EST 2011

I try to look at those markers as a way to figure out what to recommend to
people.  Sometimes I'll give someone a book that I'm positive they'll like,
only to run up against one of those invisible dealbreakers.  It's
frustrating because I really want to say "just get over yourself" but can't
because it would be Wrong.  :)

Melissa Proffitt

On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:29:17 +1100, Roslyn Gross wrote:

>Yep, it fascinates me, too! I get totally turned off books that try to be
>'literary' and postmodern - the pretension puts me off immediately. I
>might manage to get something interesting out of the book if I finish it,
>but I won't value the book very much and I wouldn't say I enjoyed' it. Yet
>I know people who will say, Yes, I know it's pretentious, but happily
>enjoy it anyway. So I think I know what you mean when you talk about using
>it as a marker to identify what kind of reader you are. You can kind of
>'enjoy' a book on one level and yet be able to delineate it as the kind of
>book you don't value much.
>On 5/03/11 5:50 AM, "Melissa Proffitt" <Melissa at Proffitt.com> wrote:
>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:51:05 +1100, Roslyn Gross wrote:
>>>On 4/03/11 12:36 PM, "Melissa Proffitt" <Melissa at Proffitt.com> wrote:
>>>>Worst Book of 2010: _Soulless_ by Gail Carriger
>>>>Call me crazy, but somehow I expect the author of a steampunk book to
>>>>the difference between Regency and Victorian culture.  It's got a cute
>>>>premise, but the main character annoyed me and the author annoyed me
>>>>more.  Unfortunately I have a friend who loves the series, so I have to
>>>>restrain myself from ranting as much as I'd like.  (This book suddenly
>>>>a lot better now that I already have a candidate for Worst Book of
>>>>I agree that in lots of ways it's silly and that Carriger gets lot of
>>>>things wrong - she not only confuses Regency and Victorian culture but
>>>>puts modern American expressions into her characters' mouths, which
>>>>really annoyed me. Nevertheless I couldn't help enjoying the books!
>>It's always interesting to me how different people have different, um,
>>tolerances, maybe? for books.  My husband Jacob likes a lot of books that
>>drive me crazy (and vice versa), mostly along this line--it isn't that he
>>doesn't get what's silly or stupid or wrong about a book, it just doesn't
>>matter to him.  And then he wouldn't finish _The Hunger Games_ because the
>>political backstory is to him a huge stumbling block--he can't just take
>>as a given and move on, even when I assured him that *yes*, the series is
>>about changing the status quo.  I would say I wished I could enjoy
>>_Soulless_ despite the flaws, and in a way I sort of do--really, who
>>wouldn't want one's list of enjoyable books to expand?--but in a way I
>>it's better to use it as a marker to identify what kind of a reader I am,
>>that makes sense.
>>Besides, if we never disagree we can never have good discussions, neh?
>>Melissa Proffitt
>>Dwj mailing list
>>Dwj at suberic.net
>Dwj mailing list
>Dwj at suberic.net

More information about the Dwj mailing list