[DWJ] Ansible this week--t-shirts.
farah.sf at gmail.com
Tue Jul 6 04:54:28 EDT 2010
Thank you very much Minnow.
Sent from my iPhone
On 6 Jul 2010, at 09:42, Minnow <minnow at belfry.org.uk> wrote:
> Farah Mendlesohn wrote:
>> Dear All
>> Many of you will have seen the following comment in Ansible
>> *Outraged Letters.* <http://news.ansible.co.uk/a276.html#19> *Diana
>> > Jones* loves her fans: 'Meanwhile the DWJ List, having supplied
>> me most
>> > generously with a vast bouquet of exotic blooms and a fine
>> picture, are now
>> > selecting quotes from my books to put on T shirts. Farah
>> Mendlesohn has
>> > pronounced this a breach of copyright, but since I have said I
>> don't mind in
>> > the least, I don't think it is. Actually my own favourite quote
>> is a
>> > sentence from a student thesis I was once sent: "Jones disagrees".
>> > Understand that this applies to Farah and not the List.'
>> As I have now had two people (one on LJ) suggest that I am "anti-
>> fan" I have
>> asked Dave Langford to print the following, and have sent him a
>> record of
>> the conversation as proof. (I have asked him not to use any names
>> but my own
>> and that of Roger Burton West who also chimed in to explain
>> Some of you will think I am over reacting, but Ansible has
>> thousands of
>> readers, and I am well enough known in fandom and academia that
>> this could
>> (and already has) damage my reputation.
>> The initial conversation began when someone suggested it would be
>> fun to
>> > choose t-shirt slogans. It was only when someone suggested
>> printing them in
>> > bulk and selling them, that I pointed out that this might be a
>> breach of
>> > copyright, and I suggested that someone contact Diana for
>> permission. This
>> > was corroborated by Roger Burton West. Diana sent a message to
>> the list
>> > granting permission. (Farah Mendlesohn)
> I am absolutely certain that this was not meant to hurt Farah. How
> beastly that it has. I am sorry this has happened.
> "Jones disagrees" is a running joke between Diana and her *cat*
> about the time of supper, and certainly wasn't meant to be against
> Farah-as-Farah, just continuing the joke. I suspect Diana may have
> been in contact with Langford at or just before cat-supper-time.
> I am absolutely certain that neither Langford nor Diana had any idea
> that this mild joking of theirs might set the hounds on someone whom
> they both like, and whom neither thought to have behaved wrongly.
> I am quite certain, because I have anxiously asked her, that Diana
> was not anti-Farah about this, and you can quote me.
> I'm also certain that the Langford wasn't, because I asked him too.
> I think that anyone who would be nasty to Farah about it is behaving
> in a very anti-fan way him- or herself, and for the record I
> absolutely agree with Farah that it was polite to ask, and I cannot
> see how suggesting that someone should ask if Diana minded was in
> any way a bad thing to do. Nor does it seem to me to be anti-fan to
> wish to protect the fans from possible litigation or bad feeling.
> The thing that would be bad would be bulk-manufacture and sale, and
> that isn't a fan-thing at all, using a much-loved author's words to
> make a fast buck, so I don't see how saying that would be a bad idea
> was anti-fan anyhow.
> Doh, some people...
> Farah, quote me too if you want. I was the one who asked Diana
> about it so if you are being accused that is my fault and I am very
> sorry about it.
> If it is mentioned to me I shall of course SMITE anyone suggesting
> you were at fault: you were not, and nor were you in the least anti-
> fan. There is a difference, after all, between an individuals doing
> something for a one-off, and someone making it into a business
> venture. One is fannish, the other would be a breach of copyright
> and bad behaviour, as you pointed out.
> Dwj mailing list
> Dwj at suberic.net
More information about the Dwj