[DWJ] Re: Gotten, was Re: DWJ on Bujold
minnow at belfry.org.uk
Wed May 14 18:32:04 EDT 2008
>On 14 May 2008, at 22:24, Hendon, Alison wrote:
>> Also - from Minnow's list:
>>> strive, ? striven (?for strived?) deliberately archaic
>> Wouldn't this be strove? He strove mightily?
and Ehsan wrote
>Striven would be the imperfect tense - I have striven mightily,
>whereas strove is the simple past/perfect - I strove mightily. Striven
>only works with the auxiliary have.
eeek! This is getting *technical*! <heads for the dictionary in a panic>
Oh and I noticed 'shrive; shriven' while I was there, which I think is
probably as common as 'shrived'?
More information about the Dwj