[DWJ] Writing for the young (was Dumbledore vs. Snape)
farah.sf at gmail.com
Tue May 15 01:03:50 EDT 2007
I was about to chime in that I was keen on 2 (identity) and 8 (commentary
and footnotes) from an early age--wouldn't have read The Golden Bough if the
second weren't true.
But the point about 2 is that children are interested in checking out a
range of identities, not demanding that they find one that is "relevant" to
them. That tends to be an adult pursuit. Certainly most sf readers I know
were out to find out about what they *could* be, not what they were.
On 15/05/07, Melissa Proffitt <Melissa at proffitt.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:07:35 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> >>> 8] They love interesting stories, not commentary, guides or footnotes.
> >Well, I liked footnotes. In Pratchett, anyway. Oh, nevermind, I was an
> >adult by the time Pratchett hit the scene.
> Referential footnotes, not humorous ones. I still hate it when I'm
> a book with end notes and the reference turns out to be a gazillion
> citations for other books rather than actual text.
> Melissa Proffitt
> (the footnote in Pratchett about the Electric Drill Chuck Key Fairy cracks
> me up every time)
> Dwj mailing list
> Dwj at suberic.net
One day I want time to be bored.
More information about the Dwj