[DWJ] Any number of threads (composite response)
minnow at belfry.org.uk
Thu Apr 19 11:12:27 EDT 2007
>> Can it be that the mealy-mouthery of saying "gender" instead of "sex"
>> applies only when distinguishing between the male and the female of
>> the human species?
>Nope. Shakespeare used it of the sexual act, between amphibians. Don't
>ask me where, but something was for them "to knot and gender in".
Yes, but that was as a verb, "gender-short-for-engender" meaning
"copulate", not in the sense of "which gender is that person" as opposed to
"which sex is that person".
>(And don't even mention electrical connectors...)
Don't tell me they now get called "feminine" and "masculine" instead of
"female" and "male"!?
More information about the Dwj