[DWJ] A grammar realization - Where are we from?
colin at kindness.demon.co.uk
Fri Apr 13 05:39:40 EDT 2007
Otter Perry wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Minnow wrote:
>>> On 12/04/07, Belben, Philip (Energy Wholesale)
>>> <Philip.Belben at eon-uk.com>
>>> On an only partially related note, has anyone ever come across the
>>> 'Mote it be', outside a Masonic or Wiccan context? It just feels
>>> sort of,
>>> er... made up.
>> I *think* it may be in Spenser. But I am *not* going all the way
>> the Fairie Queene looking for it!
> It is in Spenser. It seems to have been a perfectly acceptable way
> to say "it might be".
> The Wiccan/Masonic context seems to be "so mote it be" as in
> 'so be it'. Why can't they just say 'amen'? Without getting too
> deeply into Macbeth's problems with the word 'amen' ...
"I blushed and stammered so that she exclaimed,
'Can these be men?' Then, seeing this, 'Why, these --
'/Are men'/, she would have added, but '/are men'/
Stuck in her throat!"
- W.S. Gilbert, /Princess Ida, /II. 597-600
More information about the Dwj