[DWJ] review site
rohina at shaw.ca
Tue Dec 26 13:59:31 EST 2006
Oh, dear. I work so hard with my students to stop them from making these
kinds of moralistic value judgements about books. What kinds of books
get "exceptional" ratings for attitude? That might give a clue or two
about their philosophy.
Oh, look! Babysitter's club books have a better "attitude" than DWJ. Oh
Chris Dollin wrote:
>On Tuesday 26 December 2006 01:20, Sally Odgers wrote:
>>I discovered a site yesterday called goodtoread.org which is a large list of
>>children's books reviewed according to plot and sometimes character. Two
>>checklists that almost all of them have are STYLE (poor, weak, average,
>>good, exceptional, classic) and ATTITUDE (objectionable, take-care,
>>unobjectionable, positive, exceptional).
>Their explanation of "attitude" seems to be rather subjective, eg they say
>for "Unobjectionable" "... a book does not promote anything wrong, nor
>yet nor does it foster any particular positive value": what's "wrong" is
>going to depend heavily on the reviewer's culture. (I'm thinking of things
>like attitudes to nudity, sex, authority, exploration, independance, fantasy,
>magic/"the occult", etc.) Their "How do you decide" link is broken.
>>DWJ has two books reviewed... HIDDEN TURNINGS and THE HOMEWARD BOUNDERS.
>>Both come out Good for style and Unobjectionabe for attitude.
>I would have said that /tHB/, read all the way to the end, certainly does
>foster a positive value, or at least a value that that some cultures view
>as positive -- sacrificing one's own opportunities to protect others.
>("But you wouldn't believe how lonely it gets.")
More information about the Dwj