pandinac at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
Wed Sep 15 10:18:12 EDT 2004
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Rowland, Jennifer A B wrote:
> Philip wrote:
> > Hang on. I've not read Ash, but why should being science fiction
> > disqualify a story from being fantasy? Surely it's possible to
> > extrapolate science and introduce magic in the same story (Simak,
> > "The Goblin Reservation" springs to mind, but there's plenty more
> > around.)
> I read Ash a while ago, and some of what looks like magic is
> explained by technology, but I can't remember if it all is- or if
> the technology itself turns out to be magical.
It's fundamental to the plot that *everything* that looks like magic
is explained by technology, in a way that makes it science fiction
rather than fantasy - although once it starts getting into the
esoteric quantum mechanics stuff the narrator (who is a history PhD,
Jim, not a physicist) gives up and settles for the broad outlines.
(Which is dashed convenient for the author, come to think of it.)
"Hold fast to the one noble thing."
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj