rohina at shaw.ca
Wed Feb 18 18:33:08 EST 2004
>In her later books, I always feel that she's come up with the same
>details, only hundreds and hundreds more, and she doesn't edit out any
>of them. So reading _Spindle's End_, any given sentence is some lovely
>detail about a character, or the land's metaphysics, or someone's hair
>ribbons. Yet there are so many that, after two readings, my impression
>of the book is one big muddle. I can't remember it, because the details
>are gems settled in an enhancing a narrative, but are one big bag o'
>diamonds drowning the narrative and obscuring one another. I don't know
>what I'd cut, but I'd cut *something*.
See now, I had the impression that the detail and confusion in that book
was *deliberate*. I mean, it fit thematically with the plot, and the whole
idea of confusion of identity in the final magic.
-------------- next part --------------
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.592 / Virus Database: 375 - Release Date: 18/02/2004
More information about the Dwj