rohina at shaw.ca
Wed Feb 18 01:36:00 EST 2004
>As a freelance copyeditor who likes to eat, I'm glad to hear that some
>authors 'get' it. A year or so back I worked with someone who told me
>in all seriousness that I'd just need to check a few spellings as his
>work was just fine ... a week and a lot of carefully considered pencil
>later he was obliged to concede that maybe, just maybe, copyeditors
>were useful, and would I work on his next book? Given some of the
>problems I'd just steered him through, I'm glad he asked.
As someone who teaches stylistics to unwilling journalists, I totally
empathise with this experience.
>I've seen a lot of discussion in various fora recently about Anne
>Rice's decision that she no longer needed to be copy-edited as her
>work was now more or less perfect (maybe not her words, but definitely
>her implication). Those who read her and were discussing this as one
>person felt that she was wrong on this and that her work had
I have long thought that many successful authors *cough* McCaffrey *cough*
have this kind of an attitude. I hadn't heard about Rice actually making
the declaration, but it just confirms my prejudices. Authors obviously get
uppity -- do copy editors get less willing to make suggestions, or are they
overruled and ignored?
>Maureen Kincaid Speller
What an appropriate name!
-------------- next part --------------
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 30/01/2004
More information about the Dwj