pandinac at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
Thu Dec 16 22:01:01 EST 2004
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 minnow at belfry.org.uk wrote:
> Anita replied to Ika and somebody else but I have lost the relevant post
> > No, no, no. Turning randomness into patterns through
> > interpretation is the beginning of science. Science doesn't end
> > there, but that's where it starts.
> So isn't it that the patterns are *there* in the randomness that is
> the beginning of science? Not turning randomness into patterns, but
> suddenly noticing a pattern of some sort in what had previously
> appeared random, and saying "gosh, that's interesting. I wonder if
> it *always* follows that rule, or if there are exceptions?"
Yes, but non-science *also* starts with noticing (or thinking that one
has noticed) a pattern. It's what one does about it that distinguishes
"Hold fast to the one noble thing."
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj