Rowling and elitists
rohina at shaw.ca
Fri Oct 31 18:53:20 EST 2003
> > Ignoring the "them there"; the second sentence here has faulty parallelism.
> > "If a reader is a car, then Rowling's book is an interstate" would be
> > stylistically more correct.
>I don't understand this remark; *why* would it be "more correct"? Isn't this
>a simple if-then: "if pigs can fly, then I'm a painter", "if a recipie is
>we can compile it to an AutoChef object file", "if this is an example, maybe
>my error will be explicated".
The statement isn't a simple if:then, because it is also creating a
metaphor which has to be equally meaningful in both halves of the sentence.
Statements like if:then in this case need to be grammatically parallel to
be stylistically correct (and meaningful). Your examples are not quite the
same in kind.
The writer starts off with a noun comparison: "if a reader is a car," then
changes it to a verb, "Rowling has written". So the two halves of the
sentence are not grammatically parallel. It's like comparing apples and
pictures of oranges. It's not that big a grammatical transgression,
admittedly, but the point is, here is a guy who is nitpicking about style.
-------------- next part --------------
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.529 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003
More information about the Dwj