Rowling and elitists

Chris Dollin eh at
Fri Oct 31 12:33:02 EST 2003

On Thursday 30 Oct 2003 12:41 am, Robyn Starkey wrote:
> Melissa kindly offered (and we so appreciate it):
> >I thought I'd share some of this individual's pronouncements on the
> > subject of what is good.  He is getting very frustrated because he thinks
> > no one understands what he's saying; he fails to realize that we don't
> > AGREE with what he's saying.  Gotta love those insecure academics.  (I
> > really have no idea what he does for a living.  For all I know he is an
> > engineer with delusions of grandeur.)

> Ignoring the "them there"; the second sentence here has faulty parallelism.
> "If a reader is a car, then Rowling's book is an interstate" would be
> stylistically more correct.

I don't understand this remark; *why* would it be "more correct"? Isn't this
a simple if-then: "if pigs can fly, then I'm a painter", "if a recipie is a script,
we can compile it to an AutoChef object file", "if this is an example, maybe
my error will be explicated". 

Perhaps the writer likes cornflakes for breakfast.

Cereal Processor Hedgehog
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at

More information about the Dwj mailing list