Romeo and Juliet (was F&H and Austen)
pandinac at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
Sun Jan 12 20:28:46 EST 2003
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Katarina Hjärpe wrote:
> > I remember reading an interpretation of Romeo & Juliet
> > which suggested that in Shakespeare's day audiences
> > would have had no sympathy of R or J, regarding them
> > as irresponsibly young. Although people were
> > considered adult in their teens they didn't marry then
> > (except in very wealthy families),
> Although I like the interpretation, I think it falls with that
> sentence: Romeo and Juliet are both clearly from wealthy
> families, and the disaster strikes in part because Juliet is
> supposed to get married to Paris.
> Of course, "looks what happens when you try to force kids to get
> married" could be part of the point. :-)
My recollection of what I was taught is that versions of R&J prior to
Shakespeare's were about irresponsible youth, but that Shakespeare's
version wasn't. And if nothing else, I think it's fairly clear from
the text that Shakespeare blames the parents as much as anyone else.
(I read an sf story once that had a throwaway joke about Shakespeare
being taken by a time traveller to see the first production of R&J put
on by an alien race, and being devastated to discover that the aliens
could only understand it as a cautionary tale about disrespecting
one's parents. I remember thinking at the time that he would have
taken it a bit better than that, since for many of his contemporaries
that's what R&J *was*.)
"Hold fast to the one noble thing."
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj