rohina at shaw.ca
Wed Aug 6 12:03:16 EDT 2003
>This is a fascinating discussion, but from my perspective I have another
>view. Writers who write historical or fantasy/historical (i.e. fnatasy that
>*seems* to take place in the past) fiction usually write about atypical
>characters. Think larger than life, think worse than life, think hero, think
>villain. We have to, because most editors think most readers don't want to
>read about ordinary people. Even if our characters appear to be ordinary,
>they always display wells of courage etc that don't ring strictly true. If
>we can find even one historical precedent - i.e. a female estate agent -
>we'll use it on the grounds that because there was one, there might have
I totally understand this perspective, which is one of the reasons why I
started out by arguing that the description of historical fiction as
"speculative" is appropriate. Authors who are writing this kind of fiction
naturally make a bunch of stuff up, with varying degrees of freedom/slavish
devotion to historical research.
-------------- next part --------------
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.506 / Virus Database: 303 - Release Date: 01/08/2003
More information about the Dwj