ferricide at hotmail.com
Sun Apr 27 20:01:23 EDT 2003
>I've looked, now, at what Christian says were the changes, and frankly my
>dears, those changes seem to me to be piffling fiddling with frills. Darn
>instead of damn, turds instead of testicles: big deal! It doesn't look as
>if they have touched any of the things that are of real importance or
>impact, from that (but I'd need to read the bowdlerized edition before I
>can be certain).
yes. this is pretty much the conclusion we came to as a group as well.
the people who make these disctinctions have very narrow views and are
interested in superificalities. that's because also they're probably aiming
at placating people who are even more so (loudmouthed parents' groups in
schools, for example, are probably pleased when they hear the language has
been toned down, in truth.)
the question about whether it's a valuable exercise to group books by age --
i don't think you've done anything to dissuade me from thinking that yes, it
is valuable. because while we should make decisions for ourselves based with
specific evidence, what you are ignoring is that the vast majority of people
on this planet won't be doing that. do i feel like they (and/or their kids)
should be "protected" (or whatever) from inappropriate materials? no. i'm
more of a mind to throw anything as subversive and intelligent at their kids
as possible because i myself am subversive and intelligent and i like the
idea of things being shaken up beneath the surface.
since i don't have children, don't have much familiarity with children from
the perspective of an adult, i can't really honestly say what i think is or
is not appropriate for them. however, i would hesitate to hand a copy of
deep secret to someone below, say, 13. judging from my own experiences i
doubt they'd be interested anyway.
when i was 11 or 12 i read lives of christopher chant and charmed life and
loved them. i read fire and hemlock directly after and slogged through it,
enjoying little of it and making sense of less. now do i think children
should be *protected* from it? absolutely not. but if for no other reason
than saving someone $6 that would be a wasted purchase for their kid,
sticking that in YA instead of children's is a useful idea. =)
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj