contrived romantic pairings(Was Re: DWJ's Faults
rohina at shaw.ca
Mon Mar 11 22:59:04 EST 2002
>I see the romance as being woven so deeply in the book
>while not being the focus of it, that if you took it
>out, it wouldn't be the same book and I wouldn't want
>to read it. Other books with a high romance factor is
>Howl's Moving Castle. And Hexwood. If you'd thrown
>out the romance, I wouldn't have cared as much about
>the characters or what happened to them. And the
>characters would've acted differently if they hadn't
>had those feelings. I don't have the same feeling
>about Castle in the Air because I'm still reading for
>Howl and Sophie. Even though Abdullah is very nice
>and I wish him the best with Flower in the Night.
This is a really interesting comment. Because here DWJ is writing a more
obvious, fully romantic storyline, and she can't help but send it up a bit.
>I don't think DWJ is flawless and I don't like all her
>books. I found Spell Coats extremely boring,
No, say it isn't so! Have you tried rereading it?
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj