Passage (was Re: Best of 2001)
Melissa at Proffitt.com
Mon Jan 21 16:05:42 EST 2002
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 01:14:11 +1100, Gross Family wrote:
>> I think the ambiguity exists to allow different readers, with different
>> belief systems, to interpret it any way they feel most comfortable. I
>> especially think Willis wasn't trying to say, definitively, "this is what
>> happens after you die." It's open-ended for a reason. I remember that
>> first time I read it, I thought it was a sad ending; then I re-read the
>> final section and realized it was a happy ending. There are no solid
and Ros said:
>I don't think Willis is being open-ended and ambiguous to allow for
>different interpretations so much as she simply wants to say "No-one can
>possibly know what happens after death; whatever it is, it's *not* what we
>think it is." I think I may be saying more or less what you're saying,
Sounds like it! The difference is that you think she's positively stating
something, and I think she's refusing to make a statement one way or the
other. But it works out to the same position in the end--that the book
doesn't end with an explanation of what comes after death.
>> I didn't love _Passage_ as much as I loved Willis's other books, mainly
>> because I'm not really interested in NDE's (make that actively annoyed by
>> them, but that's irrelevant to this discussion) and because in several
>> places I was aware of phrases and descriptions that had been recycled from
>> her other books. It kept me from really falling into it. Still a good
>> book, and one I'll re-read eventually.
>The only other books of her I've read are _Bellwether_ and _To Say Nothing
>of the Dog_; I didn't notice any recycled phrases etc., but I certainly did
>notice the repetition of certain themes. That didn't worry me in itself.
>Perhaps it's more _Doomsday Book_ and other heavier stuff that's similar?
I've read all her books now, and a lot of her stories, and what I can
remember (not that I have any specific examples) was coming across phrases
or ideas or plot elements that I remembered from other books or stories.
Not just repeated themes--which I would expect from an author with strong
opinions on certain subjects--but repeated ways of developing those themes.
Like, "Oh, this was in _Bellwether_," and "she did that in _Doomsday Book_"
and so forth. It effectively reminded me of ALL her other books at one
point or another. When I read it again maybe I'll take notes.
I still haven't found any information on what her next book will be and when
it will be available, other than the reference in that interview to the
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj