Joan Aiken (Was: Re: Regency and other fantasy)
Melissa at Proffitt.com
Tue Sep 4 14:20:11 EDT 2001
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:47:30 +0100, Hallie O'Donovan wrote:
>>>>I agree they're really good, but I found them quite dark and even
>>>>frightening at times - often it seems as if the whole world is in a
>>>>conspiracy that only the central characters are fighting.
>>I don't know if I would have put it this way, but at least for the one I've
>>read, that's how it seems. Actually to me it felt a little like Thomas
>>Hardy, where that's just the way the world is--completely uninterested in
>>the small fates of Aiken's protagonists, and all the possibilities are
>>heavily weighted toward Bad Luck.
>Ergh. Um, not for me. But then I'm not a Hardy fan and you are, so
>maybe we're talking different feelings here. :) But we can discuss
>it more after (if) you've read them.
Well, yes, because I only have one data point to generalize from right now.
:) But it's probably fair to say that because Hardy's impersonal universe
thing doesn't bother me, it also doesn't affect my enjoyment of Joan Aiken
to characterize _Midnight is a Place_ as similar.
Thanks for the series order! I also am going to get _Eliza's Daughter_ to
see what the JA sequel is like. According to the Amazon.com customer
reviews, some of her sequels are very good and others are very bad--and at
least one person said Aiken used phrases and plot elements that Jane Austen
never would have. So we'll see. It's possible Aiken means only to
*continue* the story rather than imitate Austen's writing style,
which...actually I don't know whether that would be better or worse. The
sequel to _Pride and Prejudice_, for example, follows Lady Catherine rather
than any of the main characters from that novel.
I guess I am going back to the library later today....
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj