Jane Austen was a load of re that I snipped off - now coming back on-topic

Nat Case ncase at hedbergmaps.com
Mon Jun 18 16:18:22 EDT 2001

>So what about a constitutional mind-set which would really be likely 
>to bounce people off DWJ?  Aside from the obvious, such as disliking 
>fiction in general or sf/fantasy in any variety.  We didn't do very 
>well, but thought possibly people who wanted books to be more 
>"realistic" rather than "escapist" (which we would consider hopeful 
>or upbeat).

I think people who think that modernist realism (Hemingway, Updike, 
Raymond Carver) is what literature is and ought to be, might find 
DWJ's convolutions and style off-putting. She doesn't put "P.J.F." 
after her name, but I think she has a lot of sympathy with the " 
Pre-Joycean Fellowship" concept.

I tried one out on my mother once, and she found the experience too 
intense and disturbing. For those not used to fantasy/SF conventions 
of variable space-time, many of her basic plot devices can really 
give one the heebies.

And, I think religious fundamentalists of any stripe might have a 
problem with her open-minded, agnostic view of all things cosmic. She 
doesn't treat any being, god or otherwise, with respect due simply to 
position, and that is a fundamental premise of all the 
fundamentalisms I can think of.

Nat Case
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/

More information about the Dwj mailing list