More Sherri Tepper (was Re: Good hau;
argross at bigpond.net.au
Fri Jul 6 08:33:11 EDT 2001
> > Ros said...
> > >
> > > I very much enjoyed "Waking the Moon", which I viewed as not so much a
> > > misrepresentation of Paganism and feminism, as an imaginative
> Dorian replied
> > Oh, now don't get me wrong; I do like "Waking the Moon", quite a lot. I
> > also think it's quite accurate in what it depicts, but it only depicts a
> > very narrow strand of Paganism and feminism. Of course, the other
> > of both are not relevant to the story, and would have no business in
> > but I do sometimes get worried that people who don't know much about
> > Paganism or feminism might read the book and think that what's depicted
> > there is the be-all and end-all of them.
> I'm not sure it's a book that people who don't know much about
> paganism or feminism would read.
I think perhaps lots of SF/F readers who don't know much about Paganism
might read it because Hand has by now become a well-known writer.
Big spoiler coming up.........
> TOTAL RUIN TO THE END OF THE BOOK WILL COME
> FROM READING THIS SPOILER
> and the middle, and the beginning
> I feel that what became of Oliver (that was his name?) went quite a
> way toward redressing the balance in favour of the benevolent face
> of the Goddess. In one sense he did die, as everyone thought he
> had, only to be reborn, purged of his torments. He made the
> traditional sacrifice to Cybele (testicles (and all the rest)) and got
> himself a new life.
You know, I think my memory is really going. I can't remember what became of
Oliver! It was only a few years ago that I read it, too.
> > > I read in an interview
> > > of Hand that the whole idea was stimulated by historiacal reading and
> > > research that seemed to suggest that the ancient goddess cults
> > > contained cruel and dark practices such as the sacrifice of men.
> > Yes, I think some, at least, of them did. I think she's got all her
> > historical and ritual stuff pretty accurate, if not at all pretty. :-)
> > > Maybe after reading this historical stuff she felt
> > > annoyed by what she might have then seen as the idealisation by some
> > > feminists of ancient cultures thought to be ruled by women?
> > Grin. Plausible theory. I find that kind of idealisation pretty
> > irritating, anyhow.
> Archaeologists hate it too.
I'm not surprised...
> "Any reader has the right to say of any text: "But I didn't think it was
> Samuel R Delany
> To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
> Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj