robyns at corplink.com.au
Wed Sep 13 21:41:59 EDT 2000
>All the same I agree theree's a lot of good stuff in this book and I
>didn't mind the ending. I've just read PD's Juniper , Gentian and
>Rosemary. It has similar faults to Tam Lin, the quoting, the opacity
>of the writing. I couldn't put it down, however. Strange book, i've not
>yet decided what I think. I'm waiting for my friend Sarah to finish it
>so I can her opinion, anyone else able to oblige?
I found the experience of reading this book oddly like the storyline, in
that it really sucked me in at the time I was reading it, and then when I
finished, I had this really odd sense of "hang on, that was a very peculiar
experience, and strangely depressing in retrospect". I thought Dean had a
big cheat with the ending, suddenly making people magical when there was no
clue whatsoever to it in the whole book. Bits of it I liked very much
indeed, like the early stuff with the telescope and the descriptions of the
friendships; BUT other parts were just silly. Why is Dean so desperate to
put her opinions of Shakespeare in her novels? If I want to read undergrad
criticism of Shakespeare, I would tutor a second-year course, I don't want
this in my novel reading. All in all, this is not a book I would reread,
mainly because of the thing about the cat, which made me too sad for words
(why, I have no idea).
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj