dwj-digest (Diana Wynne Jones) V1 #158
Courtney M Eckhardt
cme at MIT.EDU
Sun May 7 14:00:51 EDT 2000
In message <20000507081322.5346.qmail at hotmail.com>, "Gili Bar-Hillel" writes:
>Ooh, so active on the list...
>I used to adore Noel Streatfield and read many many books by her (though the
>Gemma books I could never stomach. Never got past a first chapter) And yes,
>they do seem to have a surfeit of characters who were born with a fantastic
>gift, whether dancing or skating or whatever, and slip into it naturally and
>effortlessly, doing everything perfectly at the first try, much to the
>dismay of other characters around them who are actually struggling to do
>well at the same activity. And, annoyingly, often the struggling characters
>end up giving up and investing their talents elswhere (Petrovas), whereas
>the characters who do everything perfectly at first try (Posys) are
>disgustingly blase about their talent.
>And I guess from a certain perspective, it's off-putting that there seem to
>be no talent-less characters in the books at all, only people with glamorous
>talents like dancing and acting, versus people with dull talents like
>organising and mothering who are deluding themselves with dreams of grandeur
>but finally succumb to their humble destiny. I think the predestiny part is
>the most annoying part of it all. And there's always a "pride comes before a
>fall" episode in Streatfield's books, that's like reading the same book
>again and again.
>But you can also read the Streatfield books as books for children who do
>have dreams of a career in dance and show business, and need to try out the
>1. Talent alone doesn't cut it. You need drive, too. (I'm thinking of that
>girl in "Dancing Shoes" who was a marvellous dancer but just didn't want to
>2. Drive alone doesn't cut it either. In such competitive fields, only the
>top of the top can make it and usually the top of the top are *born* with
>certain qualities that you may just not have, such as good looks, or good
>family connections and money. It's not fair, but it's a reality. And what
>you don't have in luck needs to be compensated up for tenfold in hard work -
>not always worth the effort.
>I think most of all, Streatfield is not very good at making the
>non-glamorous career choices seem as appealing as the glamorous ones, so you
>always end up feeling gypped for the character who gives up on a
>As far as being predestined for greatness and being born with hidden talents
>- DWJ is full of this, and you always know it's the most ordinary of the
>characters who are going to end up with the most interesting talents! Think
>of Tonino and Angelica in "The Magicians of Caprona", or Gair in "Power of
>Three", Sophie vs. her sisters, Cat vs. Gwendolyn, Mitt in "Crown of
>Dalemark", practically everyone in "Witch Week"... if any DWJ character
>spends a great enough portion of the book moping about how un-unique he/she
>is compared to her/his siblings companions whatever, you know that:
>A. said siblings/companions are simultaneously looking up to said moping
>character for some other positive quality, such as being a pillar of
>stability and common-sense, and have always admired her/him without him/her
>being aware of this
>B. said moping character is, unbeknowest to the rest of them, the most
>"special" of them all. Because revenge is sweet. (Don't tell me you didn't
>gloat when the nasty girls in "Witch Week" turned out to be only very
>IMHO one of the things that makes DWJ superior to Streatfield, is that she
>always shows that every gift is no less a burden than a boon, which is a
>much more convincing way of leaving you, the reader, happy with what you
>are, (which is probably no more gifted than the next person), than
>Streatfield's tendency to conclude somewhere along the lines of "oh well, so
>I'm not cut out to be a prima ballerina despite having devoted my childhood
>to nothing but ballet, however I was always very good at washing dishes and
>someone has to wash the dishes for the prima ballerinas therefore I shall
>now launch upon an exciting career as a dishwasher".
>Phew. Where did that all come from?
>Also, Becca, a person as eloquent and erudite are yourself is merely being
>coy by calling herself a "baby dragon". Especially since no one is going to
>oppose you with flames or lances - the very worst you'll get here are
>opposing opinions. Which can always be blasted into insignificance by merely
>And just to add my literary two-bits to the whole identical male/female
>twins debate: Ursula LeGuin wrote a short story or novella that featured a
>set of clones that were sent as a work-force to some mine on a small planet.
>She wrote of both female and male clones of the same person, explaining that
>the parent was male, and the female clones were engineered by multiplying
>the parent's single X chromosome. One of my books called "The Science in
>Science Fiction" pooh-poohs this concept specifically, pointing out not only
>that an individual created thus is not strictly speaking a clone, but would
>be unusually suceptible to genetic disorders linked to the X chromosome -
>things like hemophilia, color blindness, and worse.
>That's all, Folks!
>(I find it so confusing now there's a Gill on the list, I keep reaching the
>bottom of a post and mistaking your name for mine, and thinking "Funny, I
>don't remember writing that...")
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
>Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj