sodgers at hotnet.net.au
Thu May 4 23:09:37 EDT 2000
>Nothing wrong with 'identical' boy-girl twins. *Shakespeare* used
>identical boy-girl twins.
>(Anyway, are they actually impossible, or just horrendously unlikely?)
Shakespeare, (she said darkly) did a *lot* of things.
I think they are *almost impossible. Identical twins come from the splitting
of a group of cells that began as one potential child and develop into 2 (or
more or less). hat's why they're invariably the same sex. Fraternal twins
can be boy/boy girl/girl or boy/girl. They're the result of two separate
conceptions that happened at the same time. They're no more alike (except in
size) than any two siblings.
* I said "almost impossible" because unrelated or slightly related doubles
do occur sometimes, just by a fluke. I suppose it might happen with twins.
And, as I'm certain everyone here knows, Shakespeare had an ulterior motive
for his disguised heroines. As G. Trease pointed out, it's easier for a boy
actor to pretend to be a girl pretending to be a boy than to pretend to be a
girl pretending to be a girl.
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj