Fwd: Re: yotg discussion (spoilers)
ncase at hedbergmaps.com
Fri Dec 15 14:27:37 EST 2000
>>I'll add one last thing. There was a point in the book, where I
>>more frightening and depressing that Wermacht, because, as you said Wermacht
>>was basically afraid, but also stupid and could be dealt with.
>>Corkoran, or so
>>I felt, was much further in de-humanizing, seeing other people
>>merely as means
>>to his end. When he thinks of just using the assasins in experiments, or when
>>he considers helping the heroes only because he finds out they could help his
>>project. This scene made me shiver. When one continues in this way,
>>no longer seen as subjects, but as objects, (I'm not sure wheter this makes
>>sense in English, too), not as fellow human beings, but things, being useful
>>or not. And this an attitude that frightens me to the bones.
>Yes! Corkoran reminds me (intentionally, I assume) of many of my
>friends. There is a slightly sinister element in the culture of
>computer programmers, and maybe scientists in general, which goes
>against my usual experience of computer nerds as basically friendly
>if occasionally socially inept (and I'll take that kind of ineptness
>over Laurel-like social eptness any day). I don't know. It seems to
>me like DWJ has been wrestling with some of the larger consequences
>of powerful nerds for a while, certainly in Deep Secret, maybe in
>Hexwood. It's not a knock-you-over-the-head Theme, but it's an
>undercurrent. Like she's trying to figure out what bothers her. In
>Corkoran she's come up with what to me was a basically sympathetic
>character, whose flaws rather than his inherent Evil Intent make him
>a danger to himself and others. His outlook is not so totally off
>different from Derk's, if you think about it. But the subtle
>differences really do make all the difference.
To unsubscribe, email dwj-request at suberic.net with the body "unsubscribe".
Visit the archives at http://suberic.net/dwj/list/
More information about the Dwj